A federal court has blocked the Biden administration’s attempt to extend Affordable Care Act (ACA) benefits to “Dreamers” in 19 states, sparking a heated debate on healthcare access for undocumented immigrants.
At a Glance
- Federal judge halts ACA coverage for DACA recipients in 19 states
- Ruling challenges Biden administration’s expansion of “lawfully present” definition
- Decision affects an estimated 100,000 potential Dreamer enrollees
- Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach lauds ruling as a “win for the rule of law”
Court Blocks ACA Benefits for Dreamers
U.S. District Judge Daniel M. Traynor has granted a preliminary injunction to 19 states, effectively blocking the Biden administration’s rule that would have allowed Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients, commonly known as “Dreamers,” to access Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace plans and receive financial assistance. The ruling, which comes as a significant setback to the administration’s efforts to expand healthcare coverage, has reignited the debate over immigration and healthcare policy.
The court’s decision hinges on the interpretation of the term “lawfully present” under health care law. Previously, DACA recipients were not considered “lawfully present,” which affected their eligibility for ACA coverage. The Biden administration’s rule, announced in May, sought to change this status, potentially allowing around 100,000 uninsured DACA recipients to enroll in health care plans.
Federal judge temporarily blocks Dreamers from accessing Obamacare https://t.co/ovMVfRFMuU
— Just the News (@JustTheNews) December 10, 2024
Legal Basis and Implications
Judge Traynor’s ruling emphasizes that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) lacks the authority to redefine the term “lawfully present,” asserting that such power lies with Congress. This decision underscores the ongoing legal and political tensions surrounding immigration and public benefits.
“The authority granted to CMS by the ACA is to ascertain whether an individual meets the requirements for lawful status. It by no means allows the agency to circumvent congressional authority and redefine the term ‘lawfully present,'” Judge Traynor stated in his ruling.
The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by 19 states against the federal government, arguing that the expansion of ACA benefits to DACA recipients would impose additional administrative and resource burdens on their healthcare systems. These states contended that they would face irreparable harm and potential loss of federal support if forced to comply with the rule.
Reactions and Next Steps
Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, who spearheaded the legal challenge, hailed the court’s decision as a victory for the rule of law. Kobach’s statement reflects the conservative stance on restricting public benefits for undocumented immigrants, even those protected under DACA. “This decision is a big win for the rule of law. Congress never intended that illegal aliens should receive Obamacare benefits. Indeed, two laws prohibit them from receiving such benefits. The Biden administration tried to break those laws. But we fought back and defeated the Biden Justice Department,” Kobach declared.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has acknowledged the court’s decision but has refrained from commenting on the ongoing litigation. The agency’s spokesperson stated that they are “reviewing the court’s decision; however, the agency does not comment on litigation.”
As the legal battle continues, the fate of healthcare access for DACA recipients remains uncertain. The ruling highlights the complex intersection of immigration policy and healthcare reform, leaving many Dreamers in limbo regarding their access to affordable health insurance options. The Biden administration now faces the challenge of addressing this setback while continuing to pursue its broader healthcare and immigration agendas.
Sources:
Federal court blocks ACA coverage for Dreamers
Court Temporarily Blocks Obamacare Coverage to Dreamers in 19 States
