Russia’s nuclear doctrine undergoes a significant shift, expanding potential scenarios for nuclear weapon use amid ongoing Ukraine conflict.
At a Glance
- Putin revises conditions for nuclear weapon use, broadening scenarios beyond traditional limits
- New doctrine considers aggression by non-nuclear states with nuclear state support as a joint attack
- Changes aim to deter Western support for Ukraine and implicate NATO in conventional attacks
- Experts question the credibility and effectiveness of Russia’s expanded nuclear threats
Russia’s Evolving Nuclear Doctrine
In a significant development that has raised global security concerns, Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a revised nuclear doctrine, expanding the conditions under which Moscow might resort to nuclear weapons. This move comes as tensions with Ukraine continue to escalate, with Russian authorities accusing Ukrainian forces of successfully engaging targets within Russian borders using advanced US-made ATACMS missiles.
The evolution of Russia’s nuclear doctrine over the past 15 years has been marked by major changes, with the most recent modifications introduced in September 2024. These changes introduce a level of ambiguity regarding when Russia might use nuclear weapons, seemingly aimed at deterring Western support for Ukraine.
The Kremlin warns that Ukraine's use of Western missiles could trigger a nuclear response from Russia.
This follows President Putin's revision of Russia's nuclear doctrine and US approval for Ukraine to strike 300km into Russian territory.https://t.co/BCyUm7pvLR
— euronews (@euronews) November 19, 2024
Expanding Nuclear Use Scenarios
Russia’s 2010 doctrine limited nuclear use to two primary scenarios: the use of weapons of mass destruction against Russia or its allies, or conventional aggression threatening Russia’s existence. The 2020 doctrine expanded this to include scenarios such as reliable data on ballistic missile launches against Russia or its allies, and attacks on critical Russian government or military sites.
The 2024 modifications further broaden these scenarios. The new doctrine now considers aggression by non-nuclear states with nuclear state support as a joint attack, potentially allowing Russia to respond with nuclear weapons. Additionally, it includes the right to use nuclear arms if there’s reliable information about a massive air or space attack, or if aggression against Russia or Belarus poses a critical threat to sovereignty.
Implications and International Reactions
These changes in Russia’s nuclear doctrine aim to implicate NATO in conventional attacks by Ukraine and suggest a lower threshold for nuclear weapon use. This move has raised concerns among international observers and policymakers, as it significantly alters the global security landscape.
However, experts question the credibility of these threats. Historically, nuclear weapons have primarily served to deter nuclear attacks but have had limited influence beyond that scope. The Kremlin’s apparent hope to deter Western support for Ukraine through these doctrinal changes faces skepticism, especially given the potential global political and military repercussions of any nuclear weapon use.
Global Security Implications
The revision of Russia’s nuclear doctrine represents a serious escalation in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine and raises the stakes for international relations. As world leaders grapple with the implications of these changes, the potential for these developments to alter the global security environment remains high. Experts worldwide are vigilantly monitoring and analyzing the situation, recognizing the need for careful diplomacy and strategic planning in response to Russia’s expanded nuclear posture.
Sources:
How credible is Russia’s evolving nuclear doctrine?
