The Army’s failure to act on known threats has led to a lawsuit, challenging their negligence in the tragic Lewiston shooting.
Story Highlights
- Survivors of the Lewiston shooting are suing the US government for negligence.
- The Army allegedly ignored warning signs from the shooter, an Army reservist.
- The incident has led to significant legal and policy changes in Maine.
- An independent commission continues to investigate the Army’s failures.
Negligence Allegations Against the Army
In a lawsuit filed in August 2025, survivors and families of the Lewiston shooting victims accuse the US Army of negligence. The shooter, Robert Card, was an Army reservist with a documented history of mental health issues. Despite clear warning signs, the Army failed to intervene, allegedly violating their own protocols meant to prevent such tragedies. This lawsuit seeks accountability and highlights systemic failures within military oversight.
The Lewiston tragedy, occurring on October 25, 2023, claimed 18 lives and injured 13 others at a local bowling alley and bar. The Army Reserve conducted an internal investigation, disciplining three leaders for dereliction of duty. This action, however, has not alleviated the concerns of victims’ families who demand more comprehensive accountability and reforms.
Impact on Military Protocols and Local Legislation
The shooting has intensified scrutiny on military mental health protocols. Legal experts emphasize the rarity of such lawsuits against the federal government, underscoring the significance of this case. The Army Reserve’s failure to address the mental health crises of service members with access to firearms has drawn widespread criticism. This case raises critical questions about the effectiveness of current intervention strategies and the need for robust, enforceable protocols.
In response to the tragedy, the state of Maine has enacted new gun laws, sparking debates about balancing public safety and gun rights. These legislative changes reflect the growing demand for reform and accountability at both state and federal levels. The incident has also prompted increased coordination between military and law enforcement agencies to better manage at-risk personnel.
Ongoing Investigations and Future Implications
An independent commission continues its investigation, aiming to provide factual clarity and policy guidance. The commission’s interim report highlights the Army’s acknowledgment of failures and the disciplinary actions taken against its leaders. However, the survivors and their families remain steadfast in their pursuit of justice, leveraging legal action to challenge federal authority and demand systemic change.
Maine shooting survivors sue US government, alleging army failed to stop deadly attack #Shooting #TheUSarmy #Maine #SouthCarolina #Violentcrimehttps://t.co/sMyE9P6nny
— Coni Dubois (@ConiDubois) September 4, 2025
The lawsuit is pending in federal court, with potential implications for military oversight and mental health intervention protocols nationwide. As the investigation progresses, the case continues to garner attention, spotlighting the need for comprehensive reforms to prevent future tragedies and ensure the safety of both service members and civilians.
Sources:
Maine mass shooting survivors, victims sue government
Maine mass shooting survivors, victims’ families sue US government alleging negligence
